MEDICAL
DOCTORS AND CHIROPRACTIC
Cult?
Unprofessional?
Uneducated?
Quackery? Philosophy?
Subluxation?
Ineffective?
Unsafe? Addictive?
Uncooperative?
Cult?
Unprofessional? A Doctor of Chiropractic (DC) specializes in
physical medicine to treat those types of health problems which
give you some of your worst case results - pain from non-pathological
conditions.
Uneducated?
Chirpractic is the second largest primary health care profession
in the western world. In the mid-1960s the profession began changing
educational requirements to reflect the greater need for quality
medical skills. In 1974 the U.S. Department of Education began accreditation
for chiropractic education with minimal standards equivalent to
a Doctor of Medicine's (MD) degree. DCs receive the same basic medical
education as an MD does prior to his or her specialization (2 to
4 years pre-med plus 4 years medical training plus 1 year internship).
Some state university systems are now teaching chiropractic education
courses within their medical training system leading to DC degrees.
Many private chiropractic interns are going on hospital rounds at
local teaching hospitals. Specailty certification is available following
from 1 to 4 years of extended study in the specialities of radiology,
neurology, orthopedics, rehabilitation, sports medicine, and several
others.
Quackery?
Several years ago, before the upgrade of chiropractic education,
the AMA viewed chiropractic as a form of quackery and attempted
to destroy it. Following a federal lawsuit in 1987, the AMA was
found guilty of violating the Sherman Antitrust Laws by conspiring
and attempting to destroy the chiropractic profession. Many of the
examples of the AMAs accusations were found to be almost mythical
and even conflicted with their own internal research findings. This
is not an attempt to belittle nor cast dispersions on the AMA. It
is only to point out that many of the untruths spread prior to 1987
are still abounding. Today, many MDs are pleasantly surprised at
how it fits with what they do and the benefits to their patients.
Philosophy?
There are extremist in both professions. My basic philosophy is
generally medical in nature. I approach patients from an understanding
of anatomy and physiology. I work on the entire body - not just
the spine. No responsible DC today claims to cure organic diseases
through adjustments of the spine. Those conditions outside my expertise
are referred to other specialists for the best benefit of the patient.
If there is concurrent neuromusculosketal pain, chiropractic and
physical medicine can help augment your treatment.
Subluxation?
A "subluxation" is a term many people disagree on. An
adjustment or manipulation to fix a subluxation is just as misunderstood.
Simply put, a subluxation is a joint that is stuck. It affects the
normal movement of the joint, irritates the liagmentous tissues
surrounding the joint, can cause the surrounding muscles to become
hypertonic to help prevent painful movement and ultimately irritates
the associated local nerves and reflexes close to that joint. Physical
therapy to restore motion to the "stuck joint" is very
important but best done when accompanied with manipulation of the
joint itself. Only a DC with the 4 years of intensive training in
adjusting techniques has sufficient training to do it safely and
effectively.
Ineffective?
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services recently completed
a thorough and detailed analysis of care for acute low back pain
in adults. Only 2 of the 23 doctors and specialists on the committee
were DCs. Their conclusions were that bed rest, the use of NSAIDs,
ice and manipulation were the only proven methods of care. However,
bed rest should be limited to no more than 2 to 3 days. Other therapies
including rehabilitation are more likely to give temporary relief
or are more suited to long term care of chronic conditions.
The number one
injury in workers' compensation is non-surgical back pain. Wadell,
Mooney and Burton, all prominent specialists in orthopedics have
written in different research journals that mechanical (manual)
therapy is the most rational and effective approach to most of these
cases. Active manipulation coupled with rehabilitation is generally
the best, most cost effective and quickest course of treatment.
California, Utah, Florida, Oregon, Kansas, many other workers' compensation
systems, U.S. government studies, and six formal international government
studies have all reached the same conclusions - Chiropractic health
care practiced by a modern DC is safe, effective, cost-effective
and appropriate for those neuromusculoskeletal conditions generally
treated by most DCs.
Unsafe?
The safety of manipulation is expressed in many research results.
The specter of death or disability following manipulation of the
spine, in particular the neck, is blown way out of proportion and
was actually initiated by the AMA and brought out in their federal
case. The actual incidence of such cases is less than .0002% or
only 2 or 3 out of 1,000,000 treatments. One side light - does $3,179
sound like a reasonable annual premium for $1,000,000 malpractice
insurance? The insurance companies know the real level of danger
and reflect it in their low premium requirements for DCs.
Addictive?
Many people take vitamins and exercise to stay healthy and feel
fit. When they stop they can tell the difference. That's the same
with periodic chiropractic adjustments. People often feel better
after they finish rehabilitative care than before they had their
injury. For this reason many people choose to go periodically to
a DC. It is by choice, not by prescription.
Uncooperative?
Today the AMA and the other health care organizations encourage
cooperation between alternative health care professions. Just as
in any particular profession there are bad apples, the same, also,
holds true for DCs and MDs. The important issue is making sure you
are comfortable referring your patients to a provider you know has
the high level of expertise you would expect, generally agrees with
the accepted model of health care you follow, and is effective in
their treatment. Dr. Richman is such a provider.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION AND/OR SEMINARS, PLEASE CONTACT: DR. RICHARD
RICHMAN, (510) 523-2120.
If you have
comments regarding this column, please send them to Dr. Richman
at comments@drrichman.org.
Back
to Article Archive
|